<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1930 (4) TMI 8 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275965</link>
    <description>Receipts from the sale of timber cut and removed from forest land were treated as income liable to tax. The Court held that no relevant distinction existed between such receipts and proceeds from the sale of other produce, except where a specific statutory exemption applies, as in the case of agricultural income. In the absence of any exemption covering timber receipts, the amounts realised from the sale of timber trees were not treated as capital accretions but as taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:14:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1930 (4) TMI 8 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275965</link>
      <description>Receipts from the sale of timber cut and removed from forest land were treated as income liable to tax. The Court held that no relevant distinction existed between such receipts and proceeds from the sale of other produce, except where a specific statutory exemption applies, as in the case of agricultural income. In the absence of any exemption covering timber receipts, the amounts realised from the sale of timber trees were not treated as capital accretions but as taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>