<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1249 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369283</link>
    <description>A settled classification of goods could not be reopened in excise proceedings to support a revised levy or deny exemption when that new classification was not within the scope of the show cause notice. Because the disputed goods had already attained final classification in earlier proceedings, the attempted reworking of that classification was impermissible, and the exemption denial founded on it could not stand. The demand, penalty and denial of exemption were therefore held unsustainable and set aside in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:11:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1249 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369283</link>
      <description>A settled classification of goods could not be reopened in excise proceedings to support a revised levy or deny exemption when that new classification was not within the scope of the show cause notice. Because the disputed goods had already attained final classification in earlier proceedings, the attempted reworking of that classification was impermissible, and the exemption denial founded on it could not stand. The demand, penalty and denial of exemption were therefore held unsustainable and set aside in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>