https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369273 The Court directed the petitioner, a contractor with Southern Railways, to first submit a representation to the fourth respondent before seeking judicial intervention regarding works contract services pre and post-GST implementation. The petitioner was instructed to address the disparity in GST percentages paid and reimbursed through a supplementary agreement as per Circular requirements. The Court emphasized the need for administrative remedies before resorting to legal action and highlighted the potential role of the fifth respondent in providing clarifications on GST impacts in individual contracts. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 13:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369273 The Court directed the petitioner, a contractor with Southern Railways, to first submit a representation to the fourth respondent before seeking judicial intervention regarding works contract services pre and post-GST implementation. The petitioner was instructed to address the disparity in GST percentages paid and reimbursed through a supplementary agreement as per Circular requirements. The Court emphasized the need for administrative remedies before resorting to legal action and highlighted the potential role of the fifth respondent in providing clarifications on GST impacts in individual contracts. Case-Laws GST Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369273