<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Goods and Vehicle Detained Over E-way Bill Issue; Discrepancy in Order Timing Raises Concerns of Malintent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42220</link>
    <description>Detention of goods with vehicle - production of e-way bill - while passing the impugned order dated 27.03.2018 no time has been mentioned by the respondent no. 2 whereas while issuing notice/detention memo he has specifically mentioned the time. This clearly goes to show the ill intention on the part of the respondent no. 2.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:58:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:58:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Goods and Vehicle Detained Over E-way Bill Issue; Discrepancy in Order Timing Raises Concerns of Malintent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42220</link>
      <description>Detention of goods with vehicle - production of e-way bill - while passing the impugned order dated 27.03.2018 no time has been mentioned by the respondent no. 2 whereas while issuing notice/detention memo he has specifically mentioned the time. This clearly goes to show the ill intention on the part of the respondent no. 2.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:58:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=42220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>