https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369270 The Allahabad High Court, in a judgment by Mr. Krishna Murari and Mr. Ashok Kumar, JJ., ruled in favor of a petitioner, a proprietorship firm, in a case concerning the seizure of goods under Section 129(1) of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner, unaware of the E-Way Bill requirement for intrastate transportation, had the necessary documents but faced a premature seizure order. The court found the actions of the Assistant Commissioner unjust, noting procedural flaws and lack of ill intention. Consequently, the court quashed the seizure order and directed the immediate release of the goods and vehicle, emphasizing procedural fairness and statutory compliance. en-us Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 14:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369270 The Allahabad High Court, in a judgment by Mr. Krishna Murari and Mr. Ashok Kumar, JJ., ruled in favor of a petitioner, a proprietorship firm, in a case concerning the seizure of goods under Section 129(1) of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner, unaware of the E-Way Bill requirement for intrastate transportation, had the necessary documents but faced a premature seizure order. The court found the actions of the Assistant Commissioner unjust, noting procedural flaws and lack of ill intention. Consequently, the court quashed the seizure order and directed the immediate release of the goods and vehicle, emphasizing procedural fairness and statutory compliance. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369270