<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1225 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369259</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed grounds 1, 3, 4, and 5 as not being pressed or general in nature. For ground 2, the tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the issue of interest paid to IIFL NBFC back to the AO for verification, while upholding the disallowance of delayed pay-in-charges. The appeal was thus partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1225 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369259</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed grounds 1, 3, 4, and 5 as not being pressed or general in nature. For ground 2, the tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the issue of interest paid to IIFL NBFC back to the AO for verification, while upholding the disallowance of delayed pay-in-charges. The appeal was thus partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>