<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1222 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for Rs. 55,53,360. The penalty was confirmed as the income was not voluntarily disclosed but discovered during a survey. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was supported by relevant case laws, emphasizing the lack of voluntary disclosure. The Tribunal found no reason to overturn the decision and dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:57:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1222 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for Rs. 55,53,360. The penalty was confirmed as the income was not voluntarily disclosed but discovered during a survey. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was supported by relevant case laws, emphasizing the lack of voluntary disclosure. The Tribunal found no reason to overturn the decision and dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, affirming the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>