https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369252 The Tribunal upheld additions to the assessee's income for AYs 2007-08 to 2010-11 related to unaccounted investments and interest income accrued on FDRs, as the assessee failed to prove the source of funds. Additionally, an addition for income from undisclosed sources in AY 2010-11 was confirmed based on seized laptop entries, despite attempts to introduce a confirmation letter. However, an ad hoc addition for marriage expenses in AY 2010-11 was deleted, as it was deemed an estimation without sufficient evidence. The appeals for AYs 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 were dismissed, while the appeal for AY 2010-11 was partly allowed. en-us Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:57:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369252 The Tribunal upheld additions to the assessee's income for AYs 2007-08 to 2010-11 related to unaccounted investments and interest income accrued on FDRs, as the assessee failed to prove the source of funds. Additionally, an addition for income from undisclosed sources in AY 2010-11 was confirmed based on seized laptop entries, despite attempts to introduce a confirmation letter. However, an ad hoc addition for marriage expenses in AY 2010-11 was deleted, as it was deemed an estimation without sufficient evidence. The appeals for AYs 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 were dismissed, while the appeal for AY 2010-11 was partly allowed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369252