<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1213 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369247</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the judgments of the trial court and the appellate court, remitting the case for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the importance of procedural correctness and proper identification of parties in criminal proceedings, granting liberty to the complainant for amending the cause title if advised, with a directive for expedited proceedings without allowing fresh evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:56:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1213 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369247</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the judgments of the trial court and the appellate court, remitting the case for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the importance of procedural correctness and proper identification of parties in criminal proceedings, granting liberty to the complainant for amending the cause title if advised, with a directive for expedited proceedings without allowing fresh evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>