<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1202 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369236</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the duty rate on cotton yarn exported between 07.08.2008 to 06.07.2009. It held that the cotton yarn was never fully exempted during the disputed period, allowing the appellants to pay duty at 4% and claim rebate. The Tribunal also found the denial of cenvat credit on capital goods and penalties unjustified, setting aside the impugned order and allowing both appeals with consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:56:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1202 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369236</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the duty rate on cotton yarn exported between 07.08.2008 to 06.07.2009. It held that the cotton yarn was never fully exempted during the disputed period, allowing the appellants to pay duty at 4% and claim rebate. The Tribunal also found the denial of cenvat credit on capital goods and penalties unjustified, setting aside the impugned order and allowing both appeals with consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>