<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1200 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369234</link>
    <description>Classification of the manufactured product depended on its true nature as shown by the raw materials, process, chemical examiner&#039;s report and market description. The authority found that the assessee used old and used waste plastic, cotton and foam, lacked the machinery and raw materials for virgin PU foam, and produced waste scrap foam sheets by shredding, mixing, bonding and pressing waste material. The contrary view, based only on the predominance of polyurethane in the sample, was not sufficient because the same report also showed mixed colours, plastic material and adhesive. On those facts, the product was not PU foam sheets but waste scrap foam sheets, and it qualified for small scale exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1200 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369234</link>
      <description>Classification of the manufactured product depended on its true nature as shown by the raw materials, process, chemical examiner&#039;s report and market description. The authority found that the assessee used old and used waste plastic, cotton and foam, lacked the machinery and raw materials for virgin PU foam, and produced waste scrap foam sheets by shredding, mixing, bonding and pressing waste material. The contrary view, based only on the predominance of polyurethane in the sample, was not sufficient because the same report also showed mixed colours, plastic material and adhesive. On those facts, the product was not PU foam sheets but waste scrap foam sheets, and it qualified for small scale exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>