<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 10 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14929</link>
    <description>Section 23 of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act was treated as creating a recoverable statutory burden on land, so a transferee who bought the property in court auction remained liable for outstanding agricultural income-tax arrears. The Court held that a court auction purchase under section 65 of the Code of Civil Procedure did not displace the tax charge or the Revenue&#039;s recovery rights. It also held that the State&#039;s failure to realise the dues from sale proceeds lying in court did not bar proceedings against the transferee, because public dues retained priority and the statutory remedy remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 10 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14929</link>
      <description>Section 23 of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act was treated as creating a recoverable statutory burden on land, so a transferee who bought the property in court auction remained liable for outstanding agricultural income-tax arrears. The Court held that a court auction purchase under section 65 of the Code of Civil Procedure did not displace the tax charge or the Revenue&#039;s recovery rights. It also held that the State&#039;s failure to realise the dues from sale proceeds lying in court did not bar proceedings against the transferee, because public dues retained priority and the statutory remedy remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>