<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1196 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369230</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s addition of a Control Panel to the D.G. Sets constituted further manufacturing, justifying the availed Cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the sets received were enhanced and made marketable through additional processes, qualifying as manufacture under the law. Consequently, the show cause notices were deemed invalid, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:55:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1196 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369230</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s addition of a Control Panel to the D.G. Sets constituted further manufacturing, justifying the availed Cenvat credit. The Tribunal found that the sets received were enhanced and made marketable through additional processes, qualifying as manufacture under the law. Consequently, the show cause notices were deemed invalid, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>