<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (1) TMI 116 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275950</link>
    <description>A contractual stipulation fixing the issue price for short-lifted arrack quota was treated as liquidated damages, so the Government could recover the amount even after expiry of the excise year if the licensee failed to lift the minimum guaranteed quantity. The duty component formed part of the recoverable issue price, but sales tax and transport charges were excluded where no corresponding sale or transport occurred. Recovery was also upheld through revenue recovery machinery, because the excise and revenue statutes permitted collection of contract-linked dues as arrears of land revenue, and the Government was not confined to filing a civil suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:09:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (1) TMI 116 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275950</link>
      <description>A contractual stipulation fixing the issue price for short-lifted arrack quota was treated as liquidated damages, so the Government could recover the amount even after expiry of the excise year if the licensee failed to lift the minimum guaranteed quantity. The duty component formed part of the recoverable issue price, but sales tax and transport charges were excluded where no corresponding sale or transport occurred. Recovery was also upheld through revenue recovery machinery, because the excise and revenue statutes permitted collection of contract-linked dues as arrears of land revenue, and the Government was not confined to filing a civil suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>