https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275944 False representation or concealment that induces another to part with property constitutes cheating under Section 420 IPC, including representations arising from conduct and surrounding circumstances. Speculative forward contracts framed as delivery contracts fall within the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 when a purposive construction is applied to suppress speculative mischief, and a plea that the trader acted through a recognised association member fails where he functions as principal vis-a -vis the constituent. An alleged breach of Section 361 CrPC, 1898 does not vitiate the trial absent shown prejudice, and a single charge covering six cheating items is permissible where the acts form one transaction. en-us Mon, 23 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:25:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275944 False representation or concealment that induces another to part with property constitutes cheating under Section 420 IPC, including representations arising from conduct and surrounding circumstances. Speculative forward contracts framed as delivery contracts fall within the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 when a purposive construction is applied to suppress speculative mischief, and a plea that the trader acted through a recognised association member fails where he functions as principal vis-a -vis the constituent. An alleged breach of Section 361 CrPC, 1898 does not vitiate the trial absent shown prejudice, and a single charge covering six cheating items is permissible where the acts form one transaction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275944