https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275934 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to a 651-day delay in filing, rejecting the MA (COD) seeking condonation. The appellant's explanation of discovering the order late was deemed inadequate, with the Tribunal emphasizing the employer's responsibility for employee actions. Despite efforts to locate the order in office records, the delay was not satisfactorily justified. The ruling underscores the importance of timely appeals and employer accountability, highlighting the consequences of delays in legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:46:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275934 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to a 651-day delay in filing, rejecting the MA (COD) seeking condonation. The appellant's explanation of discovering the order late was deemed inadequate, with the Tribunal emphasizing the employer's responsibility for employee actions. Despite efforts to locate the order in office records, the delay was not satisfactorily justified. The ruling underscores the importance of timely appeals and employer accountability, highlighting the consequences of delays in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275934