https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275941 Rajasthan Excise Service rules validly distinguished between encadred and non-encadred senior posts, and prescribed different modes of appointment for each category. For encadred posts, appointment had to follow the merit-based procedure laid down in the rules; for non-encadred posts, the Government could fill them by deputation from specified services for a limited period. A person without an enforceable claim to a non-encadred post could not challenge that scheme. The challenge to Rule 4(2)(c) and Rule 13 therefore failed, and the provisions were upheld. en-us Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:46:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275941 Rajasthan Excise Service rules validly distinguished between encadred and non-encadred senior posts, and prescribed different modes of appointment for each category. For encadred posts, appointment had to follow the merit-based procedure laid down in the rules; for non-encadred posts, the Government could fill them by deputation from specified services for a limited period. A person without an enforceable claim to a non-encadred post could not challenge that scheme. The challenge to Rule 4(2)(c) and Rule 13 therefore failed, and the provisions were upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275941