https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369223 The court directed that the respondent authorities refrain from invoking the bank guarantee for three months, enabling the petitioner, a timber dealer facing detention of goods under Section 129 of the CGST Act, to pursue remedies before the appellate authority within the specified time limit for appeal. The petitioner was advised to seek interim protection during the appeal process to address hindrances posed by threats related to the bank guarantee, allowing for the statutory appeal to proceed without undue obstacles. en-us Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Mar 2025 17:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369223 The court directed that the respondent authorities refrain from invoking the bank guarantee for three months, enabling the petitioner, a timber dealer facing detention of goods under Section 129 of the CGST Act, to pursue remedies before the appellate authority within the specified time limit for appeal. The petitioner was advised to seek interim protection during the appeal process to address hindrances posed by threats related to the bank guarantee, allowing for the statutory appeal to proceed without undue obstacles. Case-Laws GST Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369223