<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1188 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369222</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner, a distributor, to pursue a statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority against the penalty imposed under Section 129 of the Central State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s efforts in seeking justice through the writ petition when the appellate mechanism was not fully operational, the Court ordered that the time spent in pursuing the writ petition should be excluded when calculating the limitation period for the appeal. This decision allowed the petitioner to proceed with the appeal while addressing limitation concerns and recognizing the petitioner&#039;s genuine pursuit of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1188 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369222</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner, a distributor, to pursue a statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority against the penalty imposed under Section 129 of the Central State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s efforts in seeking justice through the writ petition when the appellate mechanism was not fully operational, the Court ordered that the time spent in pursuing the writ petition should be excluded when calculating the limitation period for the appeal. This decision allowed the petitioner to proceed with the appeal while addressing limitation concerns and recognizing the petitioner&#039;s genuine pursuit of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>