https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369212 The ITAT held that the dismissal of the appeal by the Ld. CIT(A) for non-prosecution was not justified as there was no proof of service of hearing notices on the Assessee. The ITAT directed the Ld. CIT(A) to pass a denovo order in accordance with procedural requirements under Sections 250 and 251 of the Income Tax Act. The impugned order was set aside, and a fresh disposal of the appeal on merits was ordered, treating the Assessee's appeal as partly allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369212 The ITAT held that the dismissal of the appeal by the Ld. CIT(A) for non-prosecution was not justified as there was no proof of service of hearing notices on the Assessee. The ITAT directed the Ld. CIT(A) to pass a denovo order in accordance with procedural requirements under Sections 250 and 251 of the Income Tax Act. The impugned order was set aside, and a fresh disposal of the appeal on merits was ordered, treating the Assessee's appeal as partly allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 16 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369212