<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1177 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369211</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded both issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the importance of determining the nature of the transactions and the involvement of the recipients in the business activities, indicating that the commissions were more akin to investments in the business rather than actual payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:52:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1177 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369211</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded both issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The court emphasized the importance of determining the nature of the transactions and the involvement of the recipients in the business activities, indicating that the commissions were more akin to investments in the business rather than actual payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>