<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1159 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369193</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should seek redress through the appellate Bench of the High Court under Section 130 of the Customs Act. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to statutory remedies and judicial precedents while acknowledging the High Court&#039;s broad jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1159 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369193</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should seek redress through the appellate Bench of the High Court under Section 130 of the Customs Act. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to statutory remedies and judicial precedents while acknowledging the High Court&#039;s broad jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>