https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369188 A prior judgment dismissing the appeals was found to rest on a communication that had already been withdrawn by the competent authority, so the factual foundation of that decision no longer existed. That was treated as an error apparent on the face of the record, justifying review jurisdiction. The review petitions were allowed, the earlier judgment was recalled, and the connected appeals were restored to their original numbers. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:49:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369188 A prior judgment dismissing the appeals was found to rest on a communication that had already been withdrawn by the competent authority, so the factual foundation of that decision no longer existed. That was treated as an error apparent on the face of the record, justifying review jurisdiction. The review petitions were allowed, the earlier judgment was recalled, and the connected appeals were restored to their original numbers. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369188