<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1152 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the allegations of suppression of production and clandestine clearance against the appellant company were unsubstantiated. The duty demand of Rs. 1,09,39,523/- and penalties imposed on the directors were set aside due to lack of concrete evidence supporting the charges. The Tribunal emphasized the need for corroborative evidence to establish liability for excise duty, citing precedents from High Courts. The order was pronounced on October 17, 2018, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:49:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1152 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the allegations of suppression of production and clandestine clearance against the appellant company were unsubstantiated. The duty demand of Rs. 1,09,39,523/- and penalties imposed on the directors were set aside due to lack of concrete evidence supporting the charges. The Tribunal emphasized the need for corroborative evidence to establish liability for excise duty, citing precedents from High Courts. The order was pronounced on October 17, 2018, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>