<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1726 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275918</link>
    <description>Under Notification No. 30/2012-ST, 75% of the service tax on manpower recruitment agency service was required to be paid by the recipient. Where the recipient had already discharged the appellant&#039;s share in one instance, and in another the service provider had paid the entire tax, a further demand from the appellant would amount to double taxation. On that basis, the demand for service tax was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:06:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1726 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275918</link>
      <description>Under Notification No. 30/2012-ST, 75% of the service tax on manpower recruitment agency service was required to be paid by the recipient. Where the recipient had already discharged the appellant&#039;s share in one instance, and in another the service provider had paid the entire tax, a further demand from the appellant would amount to double taxation. On that basis, the demand for service tax was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>