https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275921 The court held that the prolonged suspension of a government employee during disciplinary proceedings should not be indefinite and must be completed within a reasonable timeframe to protect the employee's rights and benefits. In this case, where the suspension exceeded four years without valid reasons for delay, the court set aside the suspension order and directed the petitioner to be posted in a non-sensitive Assistant position until the disciplinary process concludes. The court emphasized the financial implications of prolonged suspension on the state and ordered expedited proceedings. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:06:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275921 The court held that the prolonged suspension of a government employee during disciplinary proceedings should not be indefinite and must be completed within a reasonable timeframe to protect the employee's rights and benefits. In this case, where the suspension exceeded four years without valid reasons for delay, the court set aside the suspension order and directed the petitioner to be posted in a non-sensitive Assistant position until the disciplinary process concludes. The court emphasized the financial implications of prolonged suspension on the state and ordered expedited proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275921