https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275908 An order confirming remand and finally disposing of an appeal was treated as a "judgment" under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent because the decisive test is whether the order affects the merits by determining rights or liabilities and ends the proceeding; Section 104 CPC did not override that express appellate right, so the preliminary objection failed. On limitation, a heir's suit to recover possession of ancestral land alienated by a male proprietor was held governed by the Punjab Limitation Act, 1900, with time running from the statutory date fixed by the schedule rather than the later death of a successive reversioner. The suit was therefore barred by time, and the appeal succeeded with dismissal of the suit and costs. en-us Sat, 14 Jan 1922 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:05:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275908 An order confirming remand and finally disposing of an appeal was treated as a "judgment" under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent because the decisive test is whether the order affects the merits by determining rights or liabilities and ends the proceeding; Section 104 CPC did not override that express appellate right, so the preliminary objection failed. On limitation, a heir's suit to recover possession of ancestral land alienated by a male proprietor was held governed by the Punjab Limitation Act, 1900, with time running from the statutory date fixed by the schedule rather than the later death of a successive reversioner. The suit was therefore barred by time, and the appeal succeeded with dismissal of the suit and costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 14 Jan 1922 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275908