<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14911</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the prize scheme and gift expenses constituted sales promotion expenditure under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that these expenses were aimed at attracting customers and increasing turnover, distinguishing them from essential trade expenses. The decision overturned the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s ruling, allowing the Revenue to recover costs incurred during the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:56:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14911</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the prize scheme and gift expenses constituted sales promotion expenditure under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that these expenses were aimed at attracting customers and increasing turnover, distinguishing them from essential trade expenses. The decision overturned the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s ruling, allowing the Revenue to recover costs incurred during the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>