https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275897 The Supreme Court upheld findings of negligence before and during the operation, emphasizing the necessity of involving a neurosurgeon due to the tumor's neurological implications. The Court revised the compensation awarded by the Commission, granting Rs. 1 crore plus interest for continuous medical aid, physiotherapy, nursing care, and future earnings. The Court rejected a claim for Rs. 2 crore for future medical developments as speculative. The judgment aimed to strike a balance between inflated demands and reasonable compensation, tailored to the specific circumstances of the case. en-us Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:16:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275897 The Supreme Court upheld findings of negligence before and during the operation, emphasizing the necessity of involving a neurosurgeon due to the tumor's neurological implications. The Court revised the compensation awarded by the Commission, granting Rs. 1 crore plus interest for continuous medical aid, physiotherapy, nursing care, and future earnings. The Court rejected a claim for Rs. 2 crore for future medical developments as speculative. The judgment aimed to strike a balance between inflated demands and reasonable compensation, tailored to the specific circumstances of the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275897