https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275895 The Court addressed objections raised by the Revenue on jurisdiction, party name change, and valuation dispute. It found the appeal maintainable despite the cause of action partly arising outside its jurisdiction. The objection on party name change was dismissed due to a filed affidavit. The valuation dispute was rejected, emphasizing the limitation contention's lack of merit. The Court admitted the appeal on the proviso to Section 11A(1) application, directing the appellant to deposit arrears and secure the balance by bank guarantee, with penalty recovery stayed. Instructions were given to both parties for compliance. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:58:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275895 The Court addressed objections raised by the Revenue on jurisdiction, party name change, and valuation dispute. It found the appeal maintainable despite the cause of action partly arising outside its jurisdiction. The objection on party name change was dismissed due to a filed affidavit. The valuation dispute was rejected, emphasizing the limitation contention's lack of merit. The Court admitted the appeal on the proviso to Section 11A(1) application, directing the appellant to deposit arrears and secure the balance by bank guarantee, with penalty recovery stayed. Instructions were given to both parties for compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275895