https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275889 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reduction of penalties in two cases where the revenue challenged the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision. In the first case, the penalty was reduced to Rs. 50,000 due to the non-operational status of the assessee's company and lack of tax evasion intent. In the second case, the penalty was decreased from Rs. 1,11,796 to Rs. 10,000 as there was no suppression of taxable service value with an intent to evade duty. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding the penalty reductions justified based on the absence of tax evasion intent. en-us Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:47:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275889 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reduction of penalties in two cases where the revenue challenged the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision. In the first case, the penalty was reduced to Rs. 50,000 due to the non-operational status of the assessee's company and lack of tax evasion intent. In the second case, the penalty was decreased from Rs. 1,11,796 to Rs. 10,000 as there was no suppression of taxable service value with an intent to evade duty. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding the penalty reductions justified based on the absence of tax evasion intent. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275889