https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275884 A landlord seeking eviction for forfeiture based on unauthorised construction must prove that the disputed structures were newly erected without the lessors' written consent. The court found the plaintiffs failed to discharge that burden: earlier permissions in 1951 and 1955 supported lawful construction, the sanctioned plans were not shown to have been deliberately withheld, the oral evidence was uncorroborated, and the correspondence and audited balance sheets did not establish construction in February 1962. No adverse inference was warranted. The suit for ejectment therefore failed. en-us Thu, 12 Jun 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:03:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275884 A landlord seeking eviction for forfeiture based on unauthorised construction must prove that the disputed structures were newly erected without the lessors' written consent. The court found the plaintiffs failed to discharge that burden: earlier permissions in 1951 and 1955 supported lawful construction, the sanctioned plans were not shown to have been deliberately withheld, the oral evidence was uncorroborated, and the correspondence and audited balance sheets did not establish construction in February 1962. No adverse inference was warranted. The suit for ejectment therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Jun 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275884