<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14905</link>
    <description>Bottles used for storing and marketing soft drinks were treated as plant, each bottle constituting a separate unit employed in the business. Their true legal character was not changed by the assessee&#039;s earlier accounting treatment. As capital assets, the correct tax treatment was depreciation under the Act, not deduction of their value as a business loss. The claimed loss was therefore not allowable as a business loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:43:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14905</link>
      <description>Bottles used for storing and marketing soft drinks were treated as plant, each bottle constituting a separate unit employed in the business. Their true legal character was not changed by the assessee&#039;s earlier accounting treatment. As capital assets, the correct tax treatment was depreciation under the Act, not deduction of their value as a business loss. The claimed loss was therefore not allowable as a business loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>