<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1117 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty of Rs. 2,20,00,000/- imposed by the AO under Section 271AAA. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed as the assessee fulfilled the conditions by declaring the income, paying taxes, and not being specifically questioned about the undisclosed income&#039;s derivation during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:54:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1117 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty of Rs. 2,20,00,000/- imposed by the AO under Section 271AAA. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed as the assessee fulfilled the conditions by declaring the income, paying taxes, and not being specifically questioned about the undisclosed income&#039;s derivation during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>