<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1097 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369131</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the assessee was not liable to deduct TDS under Section 192 on provisions for ESOP, leave encashment, bonus, and gratuity as no actual payment was made during the year. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the need for both accrual and actual payment for TDS deduction, aligning with the Delhi High Court&#039;s interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2018 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1097 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369131</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the assessee was not liable to deduct TDS under Section 192 on provisions for ESOP, leave encashment, bonus, and gratuity as no actual payment was made during the year. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the need for both accrual and actual payment for TDS deduction, aligning with the Delhi High Court&#039;s interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>