<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1095 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369129</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition made under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, as the benefit of the share premium passed only from mother to daughter, and there was no scope for taxing such transactions under the Act. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1095 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369129</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition made under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, as the benefit of the share premium passed only from mother to daughter, and there was no scope for taxing such transactions under the Act. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>