<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1074 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the order to grant the appellant the benefit of discharging 25% of the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, subject to meeting specified conditions. The Tribunal upheld the inadmissibility of CENVAT Credit on Service Tax paid for outdoor catering services based on a precedent set by a previous Larger Bench decision concerning the definition of input service post-amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:50:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1074 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the order to grant the appellant the benefit of discharging 25% of the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, subject to meeting specified conditions. The Tribunal upheld the inadmissibility of CENVAT Credit on Service Tax paid for outdoor catering services based on a precedent set by a previous Larger Bench decision concerning the definition of input service post-amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>