<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 17 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14897</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice u/s 148 and proceedings u/s 147. It held that the notice, issued after four years from the relevant assessment year, lacked justification for income escapement. The court emphasized that the assessee had disclosed all material facts, making the notice invalid. Judges AFTAB ALAM and SACHCHIDANAND JHA concurred in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 17 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14897</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice u/s 148 and proceedings u/s 147. It held that the notice, issued after four years from the relevant assessment year, lacked justification for income escapement. The court emphasized that the assessee had disclosed all material facts, making the notice invalid. Judges AFTAB ALAM and SACHCHIDANAND JHA concurred in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>