<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1069 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369103</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority to compute the time limit for the refund claim based on the date of receipt of foreign remittance for the quarter, emphasizing the end of the quarter as the relevant date for filing refund claims on a quarterly basis in accordance with the principles discussed and legal precedents cited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1069 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369103</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority to compute the time limit for the refund claim based on the date of receipt of foreign remittance for the quarter, emphasizing the end of the quarter as the relevant date for filing refund claims on a quarterly basis in accordance with the principles discussed and legal precedents cited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>