<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1062 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369096</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside penalties and confirming compliance with Cenvat Credit rules. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper documentation and statutory compliance to avoid fraudulent practice allegations. The appellant was found to have received duty-paid goods supported by evidence, refuting claims of non-receipt and wrongful credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:50:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1062 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369096</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside penalties and confirming compliance with Cenvat Credit rules. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper documentation and statutory compliance to avoid fraudulent practice allegations. The appellant was found to have received duty-paid goods supported by evidence, refuting claims of non-receipt and wrongful credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>