<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1061 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing revenue neutrality and the inapplicability of the demand beyond the limitation period. The judgment underscores the importance of considering specific circumstances in excise matters, particularly in determining value and applying limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1061 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing revenue neutrality and the inapplicability of the demand beyond the limitation period. The judgment underscores the importance of considering specific circumstances in excise matters, particularly in determining value and applying limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>