<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1057 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369091</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on service tax paid for waste disposal charges was held admissible because the Tribunal treated the issue as covered by its earlier ruling allowing credit on hazardous waste management service. No contrary authority was produced by the Revenue, so the precedent was followed and the denial of credit was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:50:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1057 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369091</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on service tax paid for waste disposal charges was held admissible because the Tribunal treated the issue as covered by its earlier ruling allowing credit on hazardous waste management service. No contrary authority was produced by the Revenue, so the precedent was followed and the denial of credit was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>