<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1056 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369090</link>
    <description>A disciplinary charge memo alleging production of a bogus certificate and fraudulent promotion was held not liable to be quashed in writ jurisdiction, because interference at the charge-sheet stage is confined to exceptional cases such as lack of jurisdiction, incompetence of the issuing authority, mala fides, or patent illegality, and the truth of the allegations must be examined by the disciplinary authority. Interference with the reversion order was also declined in view of the employee&#039;s prolonged suspension and the fact that the reversion had not been worked out for years. The disciplinary proceedings were directed to be completed on merits after reasonable opportunity to the employee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:49:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1056 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369090</link>
      <description>A disciplinary charge memo alleging production of a bogus certificate and fraudulent promotion was held not liable to be quashed in writ jurisdiction, because interference at the charge-sheet stage is confined to exceptional cases such as lack of jurisdiction, incompetence of the issuing authority, mala fides, or patent illegality, and the truth of the allegations must be examined by the disciplinary authority. Interference with the reversion order was also declined in view of the employee&#039;s prolonged suspension and the fact that the reversion had not been worked out for years. The disciplinary proceedings were directed to be completed on merits after reasonable opportunity to the employee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>