<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1270 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both the Revenue&#039;s and the assessee&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, remanding the issue back to the AO for a fresh decision after verifying the actual cost of the finished goods from the stock records. The Tribunal emphasized the need for adherence to Rule 46A and proper verification of evidence before making any additions to the income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:41:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1270 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both the Revenue&#039;s and the assessee&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, remanding the issue back to the AO for a fresh decision after verifying the actual cost of the finished goods from the stock records. The Tribunal emphasized the need for adherence to Rule 46A and proper verification of evidence before making any additions to the income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>