<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1654 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275871</link>
    <description>Hoardings erected on land vested in the Airports Authority of India remained subject to municipal, planning and coastal regulation because the land was outside the airport proper and the special statute did not create an express exemption. Prior permission from the municipal corporation and the competent coastal authority was required for such structures, and the local laws governing sky-signs, projections and advertisements continued to apply. The commentary further notes that a statutory corporation is not immune from local regulatory control unless the special enactment clearly excludes it, so hoardings erected without the necessary permissions were treated as unauthorized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:32:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1654 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275871</link>
      <description>Hoardings erected on land vested in the Airports Authority of India remained subject to municipal, planning and coastal regulation because the land was outside the airport proper and the special statute did not create an express exemption. Prior permission from the municipal corporation and the competent coastal authority was required for such structures, and the local laws governing sky-signs, projections and advertisements continued to apply. The commentary further notes that a statutory corporation is not immune from local regulatory control unless the special enactment clearly excludes it, so hoardings erected without the necessary permissions were treated as unauthorized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>