<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 729 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275868</link>
    <description>A development plan reservation for a primary school could not be deleted or shifted by executive direction or by invoking an inapplicable development control rule; alteration of such reservation had to follow the statutory procedure under the planning law, and general administrative control could not override the Act. A prior residential user under an older town planning scheme did not defeat a later reservation in the final development plan, especially after acquisition and acceptance of compensation, and the civil court could not test the acquisition in that manner. Adverse remarks against senior public officials were partly sustained, but the remarks against the Municipal Commissioner were deleted and the direction for criminal investigation was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 729 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275868</link>
      <description>A development plan reservation for a primary school could not be deleted or shifted by executive direction or by invoking an inapplicable development control rule; alteration of such reservation had to follow the statutory procedure under the planning law, and general administrative control could not override the Act. A prior residential user under an older town planning scheme did not defeat a later reservation in the final development plan, especially after acquisition and acceptance of compensation, and the civil court could not test the acquisition in that manner. Adverse remarks against senior public officials were partly sustained, but the remarks against the Municipal Commissioner were deleted and the direction for criminal investigation was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>