https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275865 Where an amending tenancy statute expressly directed that pending suits, appeals and revisions be decided under the law as amended, the reduced limitation period applied retrospectively to suits already instituted before commencement. The court held that this express legislative intent displaced the ordinary presumption against retrospectivity, so pending trial proceedings were governed by the amended rule. It further held that the same amended limitation applied at the appellate stage, because an appellate court reconsiders the matter while the proceeding remains pending and the statute covered pending appeals and revisions. The retrospective change therefore governed both pending suits and pending appeals. en-us Fri, 06 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Oct 2018 13:26:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275865 Where an amending tenancy statute expressly directed that pending suits, appeals and revisions be decided under the law as amended, the reduced limitation period applied retrospectively to suits already instituted before commencement. The court held that this express legislative intent displaced the ordinary presumption against retrospectivity, so pending trial proceedings were governed by the amended rule. It further held that the same amended limitation applied at the appellate stage, because an appellate court reconsiders the matter while the proceeding remains pending and the statute covered pending appeals and revisions. The retrospective change therefore governed both pending suits and pending appeals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Oct 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275865