<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1081 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275852</link>
    <description>S.138 NI Act applies only where the dishonoured cheque was issued towards discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability. Where the cheque was admittedly issued to repay a time-barred debt, and there was no acknowledgment of liability or payment of interest within the limitation period to extend limitation, the underlying liability is not legally enforceable; hence dishonour does not attract criminal liability under S.138. Relying on this principle, the HC affirmed that the accused could not be convicted merely because a cheque was issued for a debt that was not legally recoverable, and upheld the acquittal; the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 21:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1081 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275852</link>
      <description>S.138 NI Act applies only where the dishonoured cheque was issued towards discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability. Where the cheque was admittedly issued to repay a time-barred debt, and there was no acknowledgment of liability or payment of interest within the limitation period to extend limitation, the underlying liability is not legally enforceable; hence dishonour does not attract criminal liability under S.138. Relying on this principle, the HC affirmed that the accused could not be convicted merely because a cheque was issued for a debt that was not legally recoverable, and upheld the acquittal; the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>