https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369072 The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose, and the findings of fact by the authorities were upheld regarding the disallowance of business expenditure under Sections 29, 37(1), and 40A(2)(b) due to TDS deductions. The appellant's failure to substantiate the claimed expenses and provide necessary details led to the disallowance, with no evidence supporting the expenditure's business purpose. The Tribunal emphasized doubts about the genuineness of the expenditure due to insufficient records and payments to family members, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369072 The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose, and the findings of fact by the authorities were upheld regarding the disallowance of business expenditure under Sections 29, 37(1), and 40A(2)(b) due to TDS deductions. The appellant's failure to substantiate the claimed expenses and provide necessary details led to the disallowance, with no evidence supporting the expenditure's business purpose. The Tribunal emphasized doubts about the genuineness of the expenditure due to insufficient records and payments to family members, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369072