<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1016 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that Rynaxypyr Tech should be classified under Chapter 38 as an insecticide, following the Supreme Court decision and relevant chapter notes. Despite being a chemically defined organic compound, the product was deemed to fall under Chapter 38 due to the interpretation of legal precedents and expert opinions. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the classification under Chapter 38 for customs duty purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1016 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that Rynaxypyr Tech should be classified under Chapter 38 as an insecticide, following the Supreme Court decision and relevant chapter notes. Despite being a chemically defined organic compound, the product was deemed to fall under Chapter 38 due to the interpretation of legal precedents and expert opinions. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the classification under Chapter 38 for customs duty purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>